Browse our guides or talk to our team.
Risk assessment describes the overall method of identifying potential causes for harm and evaluating the risk associated with those hazards. Risk assessment procedures help companies protect their employees and business and are part of the risk management discipline.
Risk assessment is a three-phase process:
Want to get started right away? Conduct a visual risk assessment with a free trial of Gliffy Online >>
Risk identification requires that managers find the events, hazards, or factors that could prevent their work, business, or enterprise from achieving its goals.
Risk identification does not include finding data to understand the level of risk, likelihood of that event occurring, or estimate of its impact. These factors are added and weighed in the analysis and evaluation phases of the process.
Examples of risks identified for a construction company building a house for a client could be:
Depending on the industry of your business or scope of your project, there may be specific risk identification checklists or other resources that can help your team identify common risks faced by companies like yours. Your company may have also documented the risks they identified or discovered during past projects. These can be a good place to start, but take the time to brainstorm any other risks specific to your business or environment.
Risk analysis is the time to consider the likelihood, potential impact, and sources of the risks identified.
While conducting risk analysis, you should consult both internal and external resources at your organization. You can also take opinions from experts or stakeholders into account. Be sure to note where you found the information for your analysis or any assumptions made in order to create clear and robust documentation of your analysis.
Using the examples from the risk identification process, here are some examples of the information you may need to include in your analysis:
Risk evaluation is the final step of the risk assessment process. It takes the analysis of the risks your team identified and requires that your team make decisions on whether or not they are comfortable with the level of risk. If a risk is not tolerable, then the team should identify steps to mitigate that risk — either making it less likely to occur or reducing its impact should it occur.
Some industries or organizations will have a set of criteria to determine which risks are tolerable and which risks require action.
Using the examples above, the risk assessment team may decide that the level of risk associated with an error in the blueprints is unacceptable. They can address this risk by assigning an additional architect or engineer to the project so that they can have an extra expert review the project plans before starting construction. This may cost more, but they determine that the extra cost is worth minimizing the risk and could try to pass some of that cost on to the client.
On the other hand, they could decide to take no action against the risk of changes from the future homeowner. Because of the fee structure they put in place, they think changes are unlikely and will have little impact on their overall business goals. Choosing to take no action is a common outcome within the evaluation process, but it’s still beneficial to identify and analyze these risks so that all stakeholders understand the position the business is in.
The process of working through identification, analysis, and evaluation are a great way to identify the factors that could throw your project off track. But, without structure, this process is far from a true procedure. The risk management discipline seeks to standardize inputs and outputs for each of these steps to create a better understanding of risks to the organization.
By setting standards for how you rate or rank likelihood or perceived impacts on projects, you can make a risk assessment process more iterative. As you work to mitigate risks, you can better document what helped and what did not. You can define which stakeholders or lines of business should always be involved so that every assessment involves a well-rounded set of opinions. And, as you document your assessments, you can more easily reference them in the future.
Consider creating a standard operating procedure or SOP document to help guide your organization through risk assessments in the future. This will increase your ability to learn from past projects, highlight new insights as you repeat the procedure, and help your team iterate on work.
Before working your way through the process, be sure to identify stakeholders and subject matter experts who can help you evaluate the level of risk from multiple perspectives in your organization. Gather your experts and get started.
This step is for identifying as many possible risks or hazards to your project as possible. In this step, you can schedule a brainstorm with your experts or ask everyone to brainstorm separately, then meet to review your notes. You may go through multiple rounds of brainstorms or use both methods, too.
It can be helpful to create relevant categories to try to structure your team’s ideas. For example, risks can come from technological failures, human error, changing laws or regulations, environmental factors or natural disasters, competitor activity, problems with project management, or problems within your larger organization.
In Gliffy, you can use concept mapping as a way to capture these ideas while you brainstorm. Make sure you’re signed up for a free trial so that you can drag and drop as fast as you ideate.
Click here to launch this template in Gliffy Online >>
Once you have a list of risks, it’s time to evaluate their likelihood and potential impact to your business or project. This will likely be a written activity, but you can continue to use your concept map from the first step to guide your research and conversation.
You may decide that “low risk” items don’t require deep assessment. Adding color coding to your original concept map can help clarify for stakeholders which risks will be assessed in depth and which will be quickly addressed. Here’s an example of what this can look like in Gliffy:
You could also plot the risks you identified against their likelihood of happening and their impact to your business. This is called a risk analysis chart.
Click here to launch this risk analysis chart as a template in Gliffy Online >>
Diagrams have a great way of getting people to share their feedback or ideas. As you enter the evaluation phase, bring the visuals that support your research and assessment. If you use Gliffy, you can easily make tweaks and review version history for your work, making it easy to adjust to feedback as your team evaluates the risks.
These diagrams and charts are also great to include in documentation so that you can quickly explain your decisions in the future or reference them should one of the risks occur. Be sure to embed diagrams in your team’s documentation to make them easy to find and review.
With Gliffy, diagramming is simple and fast — you can just drag and drop shapes at the speed of your ideas so it’s great for business diagrams like flowcharts, org charts, and more. Start your free trial and try using Gliffy to identify and assess risks to your business today.
Try Online Atlassian Apps
Risk assessment is a valuable skill for any team leader in any industry. Because Gliffy is a popular tool when it comes to diagrams for software engineering, these resources might help:
✏️ Blog: Risk Scoring for Product Developers📄 White Paper: Risk Management in Software Development is Easier than You Think